This is the widest price gap between two like products we sell: $98.99 per 1,000 LinkedIn post reactions against $39.99 per 1,000 X likes. LinkedIn shows every reactor by name and job title; X shows a count and hides the list. One is a named endorsement inside a professional feed, the other is a number under a post.
Directional claims only — no fabricated numbers. Use this as a shortlist, not a spec.
| Criterion | LinkedIn Post Likes | X Likes |
|---|---|---|
| Standard price, 1k | $98.99 | $39.99 |
| Standard price, 100 | $9.99 | $4.99 |
| Liker identity | Name and headline shown | Count shown, liker list hidden |
| Reach effect | A reaction can surface the post further | Minimal — reposts do the spreading |
| Post lifespan | Days — the feed moves slowly | Hours — the timeline moves fast |
| Best for | Hiring posts, case studies, funding news | Launch posts, pinned posts, threads |
LinkedIn reactions are worth 2.5x the price only when the people seeing them are buyers. Two hundred reactions on a case study does more for a B2B pipeline than a thousand hearts on a tweet. For volume, pinned-post credibility, and broad reach, X likes at $39.99 per 1,000 are the better rate.
LinkedIn accounts are harder to source and the platform moderates engagement more closely, putting 1k reactions at $98.99 against $39.99 on X. Both ship with the same 30-day refill and the same Standard, Active, and VIP speed tiers.
Yes. LinkedIn lists each reactor by name and headline, so keep quantities proportionate. A few hundred reactions on a post with a handful of comments reads better than a thousand.
The count on your post stays visible, but X hid the list of who liked a post in 2024. That makes an X like a count signal rather than a named endorsement.
Every service includes a free trial and a 30-day refill window. Pay in crypto if privacy is the point.